User talk:唐吉訶德的侍從
Add topicWelcome
[edit source]| In other languages (Translate!) |
English · čeština · Deutsch · español · Esperanto · français · italiano · magyar · Nederlands · norsk bokmål · português · Ripoarisch · română · Tiếng Việt · Türkçe · Ελληνικά · русский · українська · संस्कृतम् · বাংলা · 한국어 · 日本語 · 中文(简体) · עברית · العربية · تۆرکجه | (3) |
- Help & FAQ
- Manual (to create a wiki)
- Community portal
- Editing help
- Language support
- Sandbox
Welcome to Wikimedia Incubator! At the right there are some important links, and here are some tips and info:
- If you haven't created a user page yet, please create one with for example Babel templates on it.
- You can select your interface language in your preferences.
- If you make articles, templates or categories, don't forget to add a prefix!
- If your knowledge of English is good, you can help with translating pages to other languages you know, so more people can understand it!
- If you want to translate the interface, please go to Translatewiki.net and follow the instructions.
thank you
[edit source]thanks for your protect putian language! it's a wonderful language.--Zhouxingxingxx (talk) 08:50, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Barnstars
[edit source]| The Running Man's Barnstar | |
| User:唐吉訶德的侍從 is awarded with the Running Man's Barnstar for his translation work on Puxian Min, also known as the Hinghwa language. The Putian people will surely remember your accomplishment. -- S205645Talk 03:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC) |
| The Barnstar of National Merit | |
| User:唐吉訶德的侍從 is awarded with the Barnstar of National Merit for his translation work on the Northern Min language. The Minbei people will certainly appreciate your efforts. -- S205645Talk 03:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC) |
| The Real Life Barnstar | |
| User:唐吉訶德的侍從 is awarded with the Real Life Barnstar for his translation work on the Hakka language. -- S205645Talk 03:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC) |
Translation
[edit source]Could you help me to translate these simple terms from Hokkien into Po-sing and Maing-ba's "Pe̍h-ōe-jī"?
- chhian-kí (千紀)
- sè-kí (世紀)
- nî-tāi (年代)
- nî (年)
- goe̍h (月)
- hō (號) or ji̍t (日): translate the one used for date.
- kū-le̍k (舊曆) or lông-le̍k (農曆): translate the one used for date.
- pêng-nî (平年)
- jūn-nî (閏年)
- chhut-sì (出世)
- kòe-sin (過身)
I am going to build some related articles and categories on Wp/cpx and Wp/mnp. Thanks.--S205643 (talk) 13:20, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
And could you also build "CenturyTOC", "DecadeTOC" and "Year" templates (like the ones on cdowiki) on both Wp/cpx and Wp/mnp?--S205643 (talk) 13:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
閩北方言和興化方言羅馬字的維百拼寫應該?
[edit source]1. 以教會羅馬字發明時候的發音為準? 2. 以今天方言的實際發音為準? Pindtlzm (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for editing the Min Dong Wiktionary
[edit source]| Thanks for editing the Min Dong Wiktionary | |
| I have no idea how you created all those articles, but thanks anyways, because I am trying to revive it right now. Programmeruser (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC) |
Re:Cantonese
[edit source]Hello Mr 唐吉訶德的侍從,
FYI, the Cantonese wordlist has been created here by a native Cantonese speaker. I have created a conversion tool and have added a description at Wikipedias in multiple writings systems so someone can hopefully add a new task request at Phabricator to implement it in Cantonese Wikipedia. --DaveZ123 (talk) 07:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- As you probably know by now, here is the Eastern Min conversion tool which contains 6515 unique traditional chinese characters. It is far from perfect as I am not a native speaker of Eastern Min so it has not yet been 'proofread'/'tested'/'refined' by a native speaker of this language. If you identify any errors, you can let me know on my Wikimedia Incubator talk page. --DaveZ123 (talk) 07:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Here is the link to Northern Min and Puxian Min which both contain approximately 3,000 characters. Once again neither of them have been reviewed by a native speaker of those languages so they are still in 'Beta' stage. (Thank you very much for your excellent efforts on the cpx and mnp 3,000 character wordlists). There is no rush to go beyond 3,000 characters at this stage for mnp and cpx. We can wait until the next native speaker turns up on Wikipedia Incubator or Wikipedia and ask for their feedback. --DaveZ123 (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Wp/hnm enabled
[edit source]Hi 唐吉訶德的侍從,
Wp/hnm now enabled. You can now create the Hmn Main Page. --DaveZ123 (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
- FYI, I have created a Hainanese tool here. It can currently translate 1,500 characters, based on vocabulary extracted from this 1916 translation. --DaveZ123 (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Re: Hainamese Romanized
[edit source]In my opinion, it is the still the same dialect (Haikou). For example, I have created this convertor today which can convert the OT orthography to the NT orthography. In the future, this can be implemented on Hainanese Test Wikipedia so all articles can be viewed in both romanized orthographies. --DaveZ123 (talk) 08:05, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wow, this is a really great website! I hope it's helpful for the Hainamese Wikipedia. I prefer NT orthography. In many languages, the velar nasal consonant is spelled ng instead of g, just like in NT orthography.
- BTW, the article Bǽh-oe-tu uses the OT orthography; could we add the NT orthography? Also, the list of vowels in that article is incomplete. I supplemented the missing vowels with the OT orthography based on the article Haikou dialect (see below), but I'm not sure if it's correct.
- /iau/ = iau ?
- /iam/ = iam ?
- /iap/ = iab ?
- /iak/ = iak ?
- /ɔi/ = oi ?
- /ɔm/ = om ?
- /ɔp/ = ob ?
- /iɔŋ/ = iog ?
- /iɔk/ = iok ?
- /un/ = un ? el caballero de los Leones (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
- I am not sure about the vowel list you listed above. You would need to ask someone else on this. --DaveZ123 (talk) 06:48, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- @唐吉訶德的侍從:, yes, you can add the NT orthography details to Bǽh-oe-tu, however upon further research, Jeremiassen had also published several NT books in the old orthography.
- FYI, I found this page; if you go to the very bottom of that page, you would see the OT and NT books translated into Hainanese and their authors. From that page we can see that C.C. Jeremiassen (in Hainan between 1881 to 1901; source: pg. 51 and Pg. 107) published Genesis, Habakkuk, Malachi, Acts of the Apostles, Galatians, Philemon, Book of James all in 1899.
The translation work was continued by the other missionaries such as Frank P Gilman (in Hainan from 1886 until 1918) and K.L. Schaeffer (in Hainan from 1904 until 1930; source: pg. 113). Of course there were other christian missionaries in Hainan, however these are the only three who have their names on the OT & NT books published.
- Frank P. Gilman (American) published the Gospel of Mark in Hainanese in 1902 however I am not sure which orthography was used.
- K.L. Schaeffer (American) published the Gospel of Mark (1914), Gospel of Luke (1916) and Acts of the Apostles (1916) so we can be certain that the new orthography was used in these translations with the approval from the other missionaries such as Frank P. Gilman & other Hainanese native speakers I presume. --DaveZ123 (talk) 06:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- The Hainanese NT versions published by K.L. Schaeffer also very closely align with the Chinese Union Version (CUV, 和合本) so it is relatively easy to find one-to-one correspondence between each word making it easier to 'decipher' all the bible verses.
- K.L. Schaeffer (American) published the Gospel of Mark (1914), Gospel of Luke (1916) and Acts of the Apostles (1916) so we can be certain that the new orthography was used in these translations with the approval from the other missionaries such as Frank P. Gilman & other Hainanese native speakers I presume. --DaveZ123 (talk) 06:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Whereas the Jeremiassen translations were not based upon the CUV translation (because the CUV was only launched in 1919), hence not all words could be deciphered that easily unless you are a native Hainanese speaker perhaps. --DaveZ123 (talk) 06:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, I also have a preference for the newer orthography of 1916. --DaveZ123 (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2026 (UTC)