Incubator:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikimedia Incubator
(Redirected from Incubator:AN)
Jump to: navigation, search


This is the page to request attention from test administrators, administrators and bureaucrats. Note what they can do.

Administrators can:

  • protect and unprotect pages
  • delete and undelete pages
  • delete images and other uploaded files
  • block and unblock users
  • edit the interface and other protected pages

Test administrators can do the same, but only within their tests (therefore they cannot edit the interface).

Bureaucrats can do all the above, as well as:

  • grant administrator/bureaucrat status
  • rename users
  • grant/revoke bot flags

Note: Only Stewards may remove adminship or bureaucratship. If you want this to be done go to Requests for permissions at the Meta-Wiki.

If there is no response, you may wish to try the IRC channel, #wikimedia-incubator.

  • For deletion requests, use I:RFD for test deletions and {{delete}} for speedy deletions.
  • For user rights (admins, test-admins, bots, ...) or renamings, see I:A.

Archive Archives


See /Archive

Current notices[edit]

New section

Place notices at the bottom of this section.

Tool that could help with Incubator:Maintenance/Test_wikis_without_infopage[edit]

I see that for the most part this hasn't been used recently. So maybe you have other ways to clean these things up now. But I did create a tool, which for the moment resides at {{Wt/lad/Different code}}—again, this really belongs in unprefixed template space, but I don't seem to be able to get there. The idea behind this is that many of these pages are redirects to appropriately coded pages (because of "lower" or "special"), but then show up on the maintenance list because they have neither {{Test wiki}} nor a version of {{Code-disambig}} on them. So I created a derivative of {{Code-disambig}} which is intended to go on such redirect pages. Under normal circumstances no one will ever see these, but they exist for the record "just in case". I placed it on one such page as an example: Look at Wp/inj. If you like this idea, then please move it to an unprefixed place (or teach me how to do so). If not, I'll get rid of it. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

You can get to the un-prefixed space by changing your test wiki in the preferences to "Incubator" (for me "(Maintenance)"). I like your idea. Ebe123 (Talkabout it|contribs) 21:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
@Ebe123: Thank you for your support on the idea. Note: I changed my preference to (Maintenance), but then the system would only let me create the page in the Project: (Incubator:) namespace, not as an unprefixed page in the Template: namespace. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
It requires some more maneuvering; I change the namespace from the URL. I moved the template. Ebe123 (Talkabout it|contribs) 03:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. There isn't really a manual on this, and I didn't think to do that. And you do have to have your test set to (Maintenance), or it doesn't work. But when I did just what you suggested, it worked fine.
Also, "Move" wasn't working right for me before. But I did a test move just now (using a template on my test wiki, Wt/lad, moving it to unprefixed Template space, then reversing the move), and it worked just fine. Go figure. Anyway, j'apprécie ton aide. Merci. StevenJ81 (talk) 04:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done I split this into {{Different code/project}} and {{Different code/test}}, with some further documentation available at {{Different code}}. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
The pages isn't updated (anymore|at the moment), but I don't think there is any other way in which someone kept track of such pages. I never particularly minded that some pages with only an explanation appeared on that list, but a template is of course a more "clean" approach.
1) Different_code/project: I moved it to /subdomain for clarity (as test-wikis are also sometimes called test-projects). Maybe in the future {{test wiki}} will have support for referring to a subdomain with a different code, then Different_code/subdomain would become superfluous. But as long as the Incubator extension isn't actively developed that won't happen. So this template makes sense.
I added the information that existed at Wp/gsw, Wp/pes and Wp/lzh into the template, in order not to have one template supply a link and one an explanation for why this is.
2) For Different_code/test, I wonder about what it's useful for. Hardly anyone will even see it, as everyone is immediately redirected and nowadays the URL shown in the browser changes to the redirect target as well, so it's not that easy to go back to the ?redirect=no page to see the template. And it doesn't have a parameter which would allow adding information about why this redirect is there. So it seems to me that the problem would be easier solved by excluding redirects from the Maintenance page. Except if there are any redirects which actually would benefit from not being redirects, but explanations why a different test should be used; but even then it might be preferable to add such information on the target page, below {{test wiki}}. Or is there another problem which I'm not seeing?
3) I added all the "templates which can be put on infopages" to I:Teststatus, which so far was only the documentation for {{test wiki}}. I think we should add some lines about how to use them there as well (I think having one documentation about using all "templates which can be put on infopages" might have been the reason for why {{test wiki}} uniquely has its documentation in the Incubator namespace). [Edit: That is right, as the history of the page just reminded me. It is because formerly there was a template for each status, like {{open}} and {{conditional}}, and they were all documented there]
--MF-W {a, b} 02:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Re {{Different code/test}}, I mainly had in mind (a) consistency and (b) my thought that the search paradigm for the maintenance page depended on having a template there. We could, of course, simply skip pages that have a redirect. But there's something that tells me that it's better to leave behind explicit evidence that the redirect was placed purposefully (like using one of the {{R ...}} templates. I do agree that detailed explanatory details are better left on the target page than on the redirect page. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
By the way ... that page is now clean, except for:
  • The example (Wp/xyz)
  • A couple of items that are struck out, but are left there to remind MF-Warburg (talk | contribs) that they may need action from the LC and/or Stewards.
  • A Kashmiri test project; please see the notes there.
Otherwise, if someone knows how to run a search to regenerate this page, I'd appreciate that. StevenJ81 (talk) 00:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
It used to be done by User:Danny B.. Maybe he can do it again. --MF-W {a, b} 14:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikisource project on Incubator[edit]

Category:Wq/or/wikisource This is evidently an Oriya porting of a book which is translated over at s:en:. Near as I can tell, it is not quotations but the entirety of a book of poems. s:mul: does not currently have Oriya works but it can and since Wikisources which are new or will never graduate go there, the pages need to be exported. I'm posting to the s:mul:Scriptorium as well. —Justin (koavf)TCM 00:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Pinging @MF-Warburg, SPQRobin, who know better than I do how to do this kind of thing. Thanks, Justin. StevenJ81 (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I'll add: it's almost certainly the porting of more than one work. StevenJ81 (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Community notified at Talk:Wq/or/ପ୍ରଧାନ ପୃଷ୍ଠା. StevenJ81 (talk) 02:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Left a further message for the lone sysop of s:or: on his user talk page at Wikidata, where he seems to be more regularly active. StevenJ81 (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Stock post message.svg Doing...  Seems to be in process. See s:or:User talk:MKar#Source to be imported here. StevenJ81 (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@Koavf: Justin, I haven't been able to tell if this is moving along. Do you know? StevenJ81 (talk) 12:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
@StevenJ81: I do not know but as I understand it, other users had it on their radar. —Justin (koavf)TCM 14:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Closed projects never imported to Incubator[edit]

Hi, all:

As I've been continuing to do maintenance tasks here and at the LangCom section of Meta, I noticed that the following two projects' contents were never imported here:

@MF-Warburg, you were the closing LangCom member in both cases. As I look at phabricator:T78667, I don't see any sign that a decision was made not to import them here. It just appears that it was never done. That said, both discussions suggested that the respective contents were mostly meaningless—that worthwhile content from Old English probably belonged in Wikisource, and worthwhile content in Interlingue in Wiktionary. So do you have a sense of what happened? By policy, we should import them here, unless it was determined that neither had any worthwhile content. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Nothing was done as nobody was interested in doing the separation between pages that should be moved here (if there are any) and pages that should be moved elsewhere (if there are any). --MF-W {a, b} 08:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)