Incubator:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikimedia Incubator
(Redirected from Incubator:AN)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the page to request attention from test administrators, administrators and bureaucrats. Note what they can do.

Administrators can:

  • protect and unprotect pages
  • delete and undelete pages
  • delete images and other uploaded files
  • block and unblock users
  • edit the interface and other protected pages
  • use the built-in rollback functionality

Test administrators can do the same (except protecting and unprotecting pages), but only within their tests (therefore they cannot edit the interface).

  • Exception: As rollback is only appropriate to use in cases of vandalism, test-administrators can use that feature anywhere they see vandalism.

Bureaucrats can do all the above, as well as:

  • grant administrator/bureaucrat status
  • grant/revoke test-administrator status
  • grant/revoke bot flags
  • rename users [now mostly obsolete in favor of global accounts and unified login]

Note: Only Stewards may remove adminship or bureaucratship. If you want this to be done go to Requests for permissions at the Meta-Wiki.

If there is no response, you may wish to try the IRC channel, #wikimedia-incubator.

  • For deletion requests, use I:RFD for test deletions and {{delete}} for speedy deletions.
  • For user rights (admins, test-admins, bots, ...) or renamings, see I:A.

Archive Archives

See /Archive

Current notices[edit]

New section

Please place notices at the bottom of this section.


Hello! administrators please check the content of MediaWiki:Wp/khw/Common.js with User:Hussainalisafdar00/khw/common.js. the khowar community are facing overlapping caption of show/hide on Collapsible options. Thanks--Hussainalisafdar00 (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

@Rachitrali: Was the code present in the page Mediawiki:Wp/khw/Commons.js copied from some other Incubator wikis? If yes, please do mention that link. Adithyak1997 (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Notice to bureaucrats and administrators (16 Oct)[edit]

I want to make everyone aware that @User:Random Wikimedian has been blocked a couple of times recently for creating excessive, unnecessary infrastructure in languages that s/he does not speak and does not intend to create content for. During the second block, I told this user that once the block expired, I was imposing a "topic block" (if you will) on the creation and editing of new info pages. (See User talk:Random Wikimedian#Info pages.) I want to make you all aware of this, because if this user creates or modifies info pages, the user is in violation of the topic block. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Test wiki/core[edit]

Could an administrator please change this line:

* {{#ifeq:{{{status|}}}|approved|{{#ifexist:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|[[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|Main category]]|}}|[[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|Main category]]}}


* {{#ifeq:{{{status|}}}|approved|{{#ifexist:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|[[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|Main category]]|}}|[[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|Main category]] ([[Special:RandomInCategory/{{PAGENAME}}|random page]])}}

Thanks. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done, but modified, as
{{#ifeq:{{{status|}}}|approved|{{#ifexist:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|[[:Category:{{PAGENAME}}|Main category]] ([[Special:RandomInCategory/{{PAGENAME}}|random page]])|}}}}
because if the category page is gone, in principle every other page is gone, too, so neither the category link nor the random page link is needed. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Mass delete the userpages created recently[edit]

Long-term abuse is comming (special:contribs/‎Өөрд Хальмг 44, special:contribs/‎Өөрд Хальмг 45) and please special:nuke their recent creations. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 07:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

This user has been yet blocked. Axel xadolik (talk) 08:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Also special:contribs/Өөрд Хальмг 48, special:contribs/Өөрд Хальмг 47 and special:contribs/Өөрд Хальмг 46. NinjaStrikers «» 09:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done StevenJ81 (talk) 14:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
The count has been risen to 55 lol. I suggest an AF preventing new users create/edit other's user pages, like en:Special:AbuseFilter/803. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 03:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

global privacy issues, incubator edit wars[edit]

reporting nigos & dannyS712 vs privacy guy, in regards to vermont & antandrus privacy violations on simple.wikipedia & global problem as a whole.

dannyS712 wants to become an administrator real bad but he loves edit wars so it is important to notify wikimedia he should never be allowed to be one; he was just given rollback features of wikivoyage; he pretends to come to the rescue when articles are incorrect; first he uses fake IPs to make mistakes, then he switches to his account with another ip & looks like a hero but facts speak for themselves:

I'D suggest nigos page gets locked and in regards to privacy problems, this is something wikimedia board needs to look into; once somebody acknowledges my post, I will divulge many facts & details!!!

here, the problems is succinctly explained in antandrus history, make sure to skip first few edits by other pretenders of privacy guy, but everything else is more than a mouthful:

why was fine (polish) contributor above blocked, why was ecuadorsombre (ecuadorian) blocked as it predicted? this goes to show super vandals & privacy violators like antandrus, vermont, xxblackburnxx etc all have to do is go on stewards global block board & just report somebody as was ecuadorsombre reported & blocked and this is sad wikimedia norm but how true this video is of its stewards, administrators, burocrats:


what's up with fake police reports like on october 13 2018, at triton college[1][2]

anyways; this talk is withing the scope here as privacy violations like above are happening on incubator and the above examples are given to prevent future privacy violations as these things create huge problems in real life & i have emails from jimbo from 2006 & 2007 where he said if there is privacy violations we are to let him know immediately but those words remain empty today. 21:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Ecuadorsombre (talk) 01:05, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

I concur, XXBlackburnXx is huge problem, he does this with hasley; these people have no life, they are zombies. Wikimedia needs to look into this with a sober mind; they just can't revert any talk page they see "worth" deleting:

as you can see both antandrus & xxblackburnxx are after some lta "vandal" and countless innocent accounts have been blocked:

the problem is, all you have to say something somebody is lta on stewards board & you will get blocked like ecuadorsombre will, but that is fine, just keep this conversation so it is used to eradicate this problem but this is wikipedia where jungle law has priority over common sense... THESE ARE PURE FACTS!!! Wyringga (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

examples: Sorokaste (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

I have promised to review this with respect to Incubator if people stop spamming this project. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
this started with 23:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Usage of foul language[edit]

Please confirm whether this edit leads to any violation of Wikimedia Foundation rules or not. I mean something related to verbal abuse. Adithyak1997 (talk) 21:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

This user has been globally locked. StevenJ81 (talk) 23:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Edit war on this page[edit]

I have said above that I would look into this...if people stop spamming this project. I think this is pretty reasonable on my part, since I have been led to believe that this involves banned users. If anyone really wants me to address this, then stop spamming. I have left a conversation here, and I will follow up. But if you don't stop, I will just walk away. StevenJ81 (talk) 02:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

no reason to yell but even if they are "banned users" they do not deserve to have their names spread & known all over wikimedia[3] as antandrus & vermont do and hasley & xxblackburnxx should be banned users for their pure, blatant vandalisms:

A low priority request[edit]

Please check this user contribution page of a user with an IP. In that page, you will be able to identify that there is a box under the user contributions starting with 'This is the contributions page for an IP user'. Among them, when I clicked the options Whois, Traceroute, Africa, Asia Pacific and Latin America, it showed errors ie. those links didn't go to the expected target. So I guess those needs to be targeted to the correct destinations. This comes under low priority from my side because it is not used by many users and if many were using, this would have been reported early. This was posted here since it cannot be solved easily by normal users. Adithyak1997 (talk) 19:32, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

N'Ko language[edit]

ߒߖߙߋߞߏ߬ߙߋ߫ ߖߓߊ߯ߘߊ

ߞߊ߬ߓߌ ߂߀߀߅ ߖߓߊ߯ߘߊ ߣߌ߲߬ ߛߌ߲ߘߌ ߘߊ߫ ߲ ߒߓߊ߬ ߖߓߊ߯ߘߊ ߣߌ߲߬ ߛߏ߯ߙߏ ߣߌ߲߬ ߟߐ߲ߞߏ ߣߌ߲߬ ߠߎ߬ ߸ߟߋ߬ ߞߊߙߊ߲߬ ߡߊ߬

߁߭ ߺ ߟߐ߲ߘߊ ߟߐ߲ߞߏ ߣߌߛߞ ߛߋߒߞߏߦߊ

ߖߎ߲߯ߛߊ ߞߍ߲ߘߍߞߊߙߊ߲ ߘߡߊ߬ߟߐ߲ ߘߐ߬ߞߏ

߂߲ߺ ߟߐ߲ߘߊ ߟߐ߲ߞߏ ߣߌ߫ ߓߐ߯ߝߍߦߊ

ߓߐ߯ߝߍߞߊߙߊ߲ ߖߌߛߎ߲߯ߞߊߙߊ߲ ߡߐ߲ߕߐ߲߬ߞߊߙߊߣߌ߫ ߓߐ߯ߝߍ ߛߋߒߞߏߦߊ. ߃߲ߺ ߟߐ߲ߘߊ ߟߐ߲ߞߏ ߣߌ߫ ߡߐ߬ߞߏ ߘߍ߲ߟߐ߲߬ߘߐ߬ߦߊ ߘߎ߬ߡߊ߬ߛߓߍ ߘߐ߬ߝߐ ߞߊ߬ߞߎ߬ߘߊ߬ ߡߟߋߞߎߦߊ

߄߲ߺ ߕߌ߲ߙߌ߲ߘߊ ߟߎ߬

ߕߌ߲ߙߌ߲ߘߊ ߝߌ߬ߟߊ߬ ߟߋ߬ ߖߓߊ߯ߘߊ ߣߌ߲߬ ߠߊ߫ ߁߭ߺ ߖߎ߲߯ߛߊ ߕߌ߲ߙߌ߲ߘߊ ߂߲ߺ ߞߍ߲ߘߍߞߊߙߊ߲ ߕߌ߲ߙߌ߲ߘߊ

ߕߟߋߓߊ߬ߦߊ߬ߟߌ ߞߊߙߊ߲߬ ߕߟߋߦߊ ߘߊ߲ߘߐ߬ ߟߎ߬ ߟߊ߫

ߥߌ߲ߘߏߛ ߥߐߙߘ ߍߛߴߛߍߟ ߔߐ߲ߥߊ ߔߐ߲ߕ ߊߛ߭ߍߛ

ߕߟߋߦߊ ߢߍߥߟߊߦߊ߬ߟߌ

ߡߊߔ ߌ߲ߔߏ ߣߌ߫ ߤߊߛ߭ߋߞߊߙߘ

ߛߟߊߕߌ߯ ߟߏ߲ߛߋߣߌ߲߫ ߞߐ߲ߘߍ߫ ߟߊ߬ ߟߌߡߟߊ ߟߊ߫ ߖߍ߲ߛߍ߲߬ߠߌ߲ߠߋ߬߸ߝߏߘߋ ߣߌ߫ ߞߎ߬ߟߊ߬ߞߏ ߥߎߛߊ߬ߙߋ߫ ߘߋ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߓߐ߫ ߝߙߊߣߊ߫ ߊ߬ߙߊ߬ߝߋ߬ߟߊ߬ ߸ ߒߞߏ ߞߊߙߊ߲߬ߘߋ߲ ߣߌ߫ ߖߎ߲߯ߛߊߦߟߊ ߞߊߙߊ߲߬ߠߊߘߋ߲ ߒߖߙߋߞߏ߬ߙߋ߫ ߖߓߊ߯ߘߊ ߟߊ߫߸ߟߐ߲ߘߊ ߟߐ߲ߞߏ ߣߌ߫ ߛߋߒߞߏߦߊ ߝߏߘߋߦߊ ߃߲