Incubator:Administrators' noticeboard

This is the page to request attention from test administrators, administrators and bureaucrats. Note what they can do.

Administrators can:

• protect and unprotect pages
• delete and undelete pages
• delete images and other uploaded files
• block and unblock users
• edit the interface and other protected pages
• use the built-in rollback functionality

Test administrators can do the same (except protecting and unprotecting pages), but only within their tests (therefore they cannot edit the interface).

• Exception: As rollback is only appropriate to use in cases of vandalism, test-administrators can use that feature anywhere they see vandalism.

Bureaucrats can do all the above, as well as:

• grant administrator/bureaucrat status
• grant/revoke test-administrator status
• grant/revoke bot flags
• rename users [now mostly obsolete in favor of global accounts and unified login]

Note: Only Stewards may remove adminship or bureaucratship. If you want this to be done go to Requests for permissions at the Meta-Wiki.

If there is no response, you may wish to try the IRC channel, #wikimedia-incubator.

• For deletion requests, use I:RFD for test deletions and {{delete}} for speedy deletions.
• For user rights (admins, test-admins, bots, ...) or renamings, see I:A.

Post a comment

Current notices

New section

Please place notices at the bottom of this section.

	SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 31 days. For the archive overview, see Archive.

Translating the main page of the long part (submitting the real translation) says a unknown error

When submitting a real translation of this part (this is very long) (in quotes) “You need a valid language code (explained in the manual). If you don't, you can apply for one, or use the non-Wikimedia wiki Incubator Plus 2.0. Starting a test wiki here doesn't mean it will later be automatically accepted by Wikimedia; you need it to be approved by the Language committee first. See Requests for new languages for more information. Please respect the naming conventions for the test language, to help future migrations of pages to an actual wiki project. All of your test pages (including templates and categories) need to be named uniquely (by using a prefix) and consistently.” in the main page, it says there’s an unknown error. I tried refreshing the page and tried it again but still does not work. Other translations seems to work fine but not this one ~2025-26772-30 (talk) 22:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

It's been 2 weeks and there wasn't any response. Was there no solution or something? ~2025-28838-70 (talk) 01:53, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Same. Still waiting for a response ~2025-32244-55 (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

The existence of the Wp/sty incubator

Hello everyone! I don't speak English, so if you have any questions about the text, please ask me. I wanted to raise the issue of the existence of the Wp/sty incubator. This section hasn't been developed for a long time, and it's unlikely to be developed in the future, as few people speak the Eastern dialect of the Tatar language (Siberian Tatar). The Siberian Tatars, a sub-ethnic group of the Tatars, use the Tatar Wikipedia, which already has a significant number of articles. The incubator was created in 2014, and so far it has not had any active community writing articles. I believe that Wikipedia in my native dialect is not viable and will not be able to be realized, as we have not been using this dialect for a long time. It is better to focus on the main Tatar section. Mizgel (talk) 23:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

The viability of a language is not merely determined by one native speaker's opinion. There are 150,000 native speakers of Siberian Tatar and this is not a small number. The Mirandese language has 14,000 native speakers and they have a Wikipedia created already. Wp/sty has received contributions from native speakers throughout all these years including in 2025. In my opinion there is no evidence that Wp/sty is not viable. I believe the opposite is true. --DaveZ123 (talk) 18:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes, exactly. As long as the content is alright, it can be kept. If the content is bad, however, like in the case of well-meaning (?) "language hijackers" who don't know the language, but still try to contribute, we can delete it. @Mizgel, since you seem to have some knowledge of the language, could you tell us whether or not the content looks alright? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I know this dialect, and I could help with the content, but I won't. The reasons are described in my other answer. Mizgel (talk) 17:21, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Only you didn't take into account that this is not a separate language, but a dialect of the Tatar language. There can be a lot of speakers of different dialects in different languages, but no one recognizes them as separate languages and doesn't create a Wikipedia for them. Chinese has a lot of dialects with hundreds of thousands of speakers, German has the same, and so on. So why should we create a separate Wikipedia for the Tatar dialect? What makes us different? Have you asked the Tatars of Western Siberia if they need a Wikipedia in their native dialect? Just because a couple of activists decided to separate themselves doesn't mean that all the speakers of that dialect have done so. I'm sure you understand that your actions regarding whether or not to create a Wikipedia in a particular language or dialect have a significant impact on the future development of these populations. In this case, creating a Wikipedia in the Western Siberian Tatar dialect could potentially lead to a split within the Tatar nation. Please do not be the ones to create this divide. Mizgel (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

The Crimean Tatar Wikipedia is already created separately from Volga Tatar so the Tatar nation is already split on linguistic lines. If you want to see yourself as one Tatar nation then that is your personal choice; however others have their freedom to write in their native language regardless whether or not you think it is a 'dialect' and labelling them as 'language activists' is not helpful at all. --DaveZ123 (talk) 13:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Request edit of Special:AbuseFilter/31

Request to add the language code created via the SIL Change Requests after the creation of the abuse filter (only Living languages), including: sjc, phj, xdq, cnq, bpc, lsw, rsn, gov, ugh, lqr, imt, lgo, oie, ajs, dsz, lsc, rib, rnb, egm, nww, zcd, wdt, wyn, hnm, luh, lgs, lvl, ykh, wtb, zlu, nzr, uly, pze, rsw, izm, ikh, tvi, zem, cxh, dyr, dsk, eud, ynb, oak, osd, scz, olb. Also, remove the language code retired (i.e. wrd, pii, dek) or merged into another language (i.e. ajt, snb, lak, smd, tmk, ajp, prp, nte). Note: I am not sure whether constructed language should be included (i.e. isv, tok). Add them as well if appropriate. Thank you very much. Sun8908 (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

@Sun8908 Some of those codes will need further reviews on eligibility, e.g. Noakhali's oak where some users commented at m:Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Noakhalian that it isn't eligible for us to contribute, it's just a dialect of Bengali and recommend to just integrate Noakhali contents into Bengali Wikipedia. Better to let real speakers of those to request addition one-by-one-ly. No objection on removal of retired/merged codes. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Wp/atv existence

Hello everyone. The Northern Altai test project existing here since 2009, but it hasn't any content exept of four articles, which definitely doesn't written in any of the Northern Altai literary standarts but on Southern variation, they are

• Wp/atv/Дэвдатт Паттанаик
• Wp/atv/Каинчин, Jыбаш Бӧрӱкович
• Wp/atv/Компьютердиҥ вирусы
• Wp/atv/Кӱӱгей Чырбыкчинович Тӧлӧсӧв

Not a single page with the same names exists on the Altai Wikipedia, so I think it would worth to import them and delete Wp/atv. Таёжный лес (talk) 21:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

P.S. Same message was made on Altai Wikipedia's forum one year ago, but nobody responded. Таёжный лес (talk) 21:59, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

@Таёжный лес Well, it has a Meta-Wiki RFL verified as eligible, that may also need to account when processing such a merge. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:24, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes, but only one of the supporters seems to have Altai knowledge. Таёжный лес (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2025 (UTC)