Wq/syl/ꠝꠥꠍ꠆ꠔꠚꠣ ꠎꠦꠝꠤꠟꠦꠜ

ꠀꠋꠞꠦꠎ ꠝꠣꠔꠕꠘꠦ ꠅꠘꠥꠛꠣꠖ ꠇꠞꠣꠞ ꠅꠘꠥꠞꠥꠗ ⁕ ꠇꠤꠀꠘꠕꠘꠦ ꠀꠘꠣ ꠅꠁꠍꠦ ꠀꠞ ꠇꠣꠞ ꠇꠣꠞ ꠅꠛꠖꠣꠘ ꠀꠍꠦ ꠁꠔꠣ ꠖꠦꠈꠣꠞ ꠟꠣꠉꠤ en:q:ꠝꠥꠍ꠆ꠔꠚꠣ ꠎꠦꠝꠤꠟꠦꠜ ꠖꠦꠈꠃꠇ꠆ꠇꠣ ⁕

ꠃꠇ꠆ꠞꠦꠘꠤ ꠝꠣꠔꠕꠘꠦ ꠅꠘꠥꠛꠣꠖ ꠇꠞꠣꠞ ꠅꠘꠥꠞꠥꠗ ⁕ ꠇꠤꠀꠘꠕꠘꠦ ꠀꠘꠣ ꠅꠁꠍꠦ ꠀꠞ ꠇꠣꠞ ꠇꠣꠞ ꠅꠛꠖꠣꠘ ꠀꠍꠦ ꠁꠔꠣ ꠖꠦꠈꠣꠞ ꠟꠣꠉꠤ uk:q:ꠝꠥꠍ꠆ꠔꠚꠣ ꠎꠦꠝꠤꠟꠦꠜ ꠖꠦꠈꠃꠇ꠆ꠇꠣ ⁕

ꠝꠥꠍ꠆ꠔꠚꠣ ꠎꠦꠝꠤꠟꠦꠜ (крим. Mustafa Abdulcemil oglu Cemilev, укр. Мустафа Джемілєв; born in Uzbek SSR, 1943) ꠅꠁꠟꠣꠉꠤ ꠄꠇꠎꠘ ꠘꠣꠝꠤꠖꠣꠝꠤ ꠇꠦꠞꠣꠁꠝꠤꠀꠞ ꠔꠣꠔꠣꠞ ꠛꠣꠡꠤ ꠙꠟꠤꠐꠤꠇꠍ ꠇꠞ꠆ꠞꠣ ꠀꠞ ꠟꠦꠈ꠆ꠞꠣ ⁕

ꠔꠣꠘ ꠇꠕꠣꠁꠘ

I first returned to Crimea in 1989, during the years of perestroika, when they no longer punished people for returning to their homeland , but they did not give them the opportunity to register. Then, in Crimea, the second front of our national movement began, so to speak. People bought houses, then sought registration. Rallies, protests, hunger strikes — that’s how they got used to it .

The main merit of the Crimean Tatar national movement is that in our struggle we avoided bloodshed. We demonstrated that by putting human life first, speaking about our rights and the rights of others, it is possible to get out of difficult situations without bloodshed.

...Of course, according to the well-known presumption, which is also recognized by Soviet criminal law, it is not the accused who must prove his innocence, but the prosecution that the accused is guilty. That is, in this case, the prosecution would have to prove that the statement of the accused quoted by it is slanderous. But since it evaded this duty, I do not object to the burden of proof being placed on me in this matter. After all, if this is truly a trial, and not something else, then the accusation must be verified. And if it turns out that there were and are no restrictions on the issue of registration and employment of Crimean Tatars in Crimea on the basis of nationality, then I am ready to plead guilty to slander in the Soviet way and humbly bear the most severe punishment. — Excerpt of Mustafa Dzhemilev's speech during the Omsk trial.