Talk:Wy/da/Frankrig og Monaco
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Philaweb
What's the meaning of article? So might as well we can write articles like "GB & Ireland", "Italy & San Marino", "Russia & Belarus", "Czech Republic & Slovakia"... there will be approximately the same content. There are two separate pages about France and Monaco, what else to think of?--Leinbach (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I am sure there is a more constructive way to articulate the aggressiveness of your question? And perhaps you can do so in the Danish language, it is after all the language of this project. At least, that was the intention. Philaweb (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- First, Wikimedia projects are free ones; and this is a test project, where's nothing wrong in talking in English. I strongly support the Danish Wikivoyage and I try to help as I can. I just wondered why; but not showed an agression or something like this. If my reply really was harsh, excuse me. Also we may replace this discussion to my user talk, if you don't like English here. Best regards, --Leinbach (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- We are trying to make people interested in this project, and not all feel comfortable communicating in English. If you have a question, please stick to the point in a neutral tone and do not invent problems like "So might as well we can write articles like...". This article is most probably created by mistake, so no need to question peoples intentions. And, you are excused... Philaweb (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Let me reformulate my phrase. "So might as well we can write articles like..." = "Then here may be appeared articles like..." Looks better? I hope yes.--Leinbach (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I did not miss your point in the first place. Philaweb (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- That's not bad too. Bye.--Leinbach (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since when has it been forbidden to communicate in other languages than (in this case) Danish on talk pages? It also happens on dawiki :-).
- Sarrus (c • t) 20:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)- It is not prohibited to communicate in other languages, which was not my point. My point was, that not all people feel comfortable communicating in another language. Ergo, if most of the communication is in English (or, theoretically, in another language), some people might not want to contribute to the project, since they would be afraid whether they are capable of communicating their thoughts. Philaweb (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Since when has it been forbidden to communicate in other languages than (in this case) Danish on talk pages? It also happens on dawiki :-).
- That's not bad too. Bye.--Leinbach (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- I did not miss your point in the first place. Philaweb (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Let me reformulate my phrase. "So might as well we can write articles like..." = "Then here may be appeared articles like..." Looks better? I hope yes.--Leinbach (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- We are trying to make people interested in this project, and not all feel comfortable communicating in English. If you have a question, please stick to the point in a neutral tone and do not invent problems like "So might as well we can write articles like...". This article is most probably created by mistake, so no need to question peoples intentions. And, you are excused... Philaweb (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- First, Wikimedia projects are free ones; and this is a test project, where's nothing wrong in talking in English. I strongly support the Danish Wikivoyage and I try to help as I can. I just wondered why; but not showed an agression or something like this. If my reply really was harsh, excuse me. Also we may replace this discussion to my user talk, if you don't like English here. Best regards, --Leinbach (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)