Incubator talk:Requests for deletions

    From Wikimedia Incubator

    Page appearance[edit source]

    • {{policy}} should not be on top of the discusion page, at least move it under «Introduction» heading
    • Please move «Introduction» section into a subpage (more convenient and will save some server space)
    • Please mention somewhere on the page what Incubator Plus is (I had to google it to find out)

    Alex Smotrov 15:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    • Not needed I think, but feel free if you want to change it. By the way, it is the same as at Incubator:Administrators
    • This hasn't any effect on the server space. It happens much.
    • I will do that.
    SPQRobin 19:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Well, the part «You may edit it, but please discuss major changes on the talk page first» (where «edit it» = «edit this page», since the notice is on top) clearly contradicts with the meaning «edit freely to leave your comment about requests below»
    As for the server space... each edit, however small, creates a whole new version of the page. If the 1st part of the page (up to ==Requests==) could to replaced with {{/Header}}, then each version would take approx. 1500 bytes less. I agree it's not much, but it's still something. It's just a common practice to replace mostly unchangeable sections on discussion pages with a subpage transclusion
    Alex Smotrov 15:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    But it could be that it saves some server space if we leave it on this page. I don't know. Please take a look at w:Wikipedia:Don't worry about performance.
    And, ok, i've moved the {{policy}} note. SPQRobin 15:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Lingwa de planeta Wiktionary[edit source]

    Hello, I recently stumbled across a project on the incubator, it is a Wiktionary project for a constructed language without a real ISO code, the English Wikipedia has an article for Lingwa de planeta, but lists no ISO code and a search at SIL for the code lpl turned up no results[1], I am not sure weather or not the project should be nominated for deletion. Abrahamic Faiths (talk) 23:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    woops, my bad, looks as though this has already been listed, I must have overlooked it when I was searching for it. Abrahamic Faiths (talk) 23:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]