Jump to content

Wn/syl/Wikinews:Speedy keep

From Wikimedia Incubator
< Wn | syl
Wn > syl > Wikinews:Speedy keep

Template:Wn/syl/Wikinews subcat guideline


Speedy keep is the process of closing deletion discussions with a result of "speedy keep" before the normal discussion period ends, but without unlisting or deleting the actual discussion. This guideline applies only to "speedy keep" closures; the criteria for speedy deletion cover the circumstances under which pages may be deleted immediately.

Applicability

[edit | edit source]
Shortcut:
WP:SKCRIT

Reasons for a speedy keep decision are:

  1. Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor". Absence of delete rationale. Normally the nominator will provide grounds for deletion in the delete rationale, but if (a) the nominator withdraws the nomination, perhaps because of improvements to the article that happen during the AfD, or (b) the nominator failed to give intelligible grounds for content deletion (i.e. arguments that would support deletion, userfying or redirection, perhaps only proposing an alternative action such as moving or merging) and no new delete rationale appears in the deletion discussion.[1] Exceptions:Template:Wn/syl/Ordered list
  2. Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".The nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption and, since questionable motivations on the part of the nominator do not have a direct bearing on the validity of the nomination, no uninvolved editor has recommended deletion or redirection as an outcome of the discussion. For example: Template:Wn/syl/Ordered list
  3. Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".The nomination is completely erroneous. No accurate deletion rationale has been provided.
  4. Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".The nominator was blocked or banned at the time of making the nomination, so they were not supposed to edit. In that case, the nominated page is speedily kept while the nomination can be removed from the log, tagged with {{db-banned}} and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. However, if subsequent editors added substantive comments in good faith before the nominator's blocked or banned status was discovered, the nomination may not be speedily closed[2] (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision).
  5. Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".The page is a policy or guideline. The deletion processes are not a forum for revoking policy.
  6. Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".The page/image is currently linked from the Main Page. In such cases, please wait until the link is no longer on the Main Page before nominating. If the problem is urgent, consensus should be gained at WP:ERRORS to remove the link before nominating for deletion.

If a page is nominated for deletion on the wrong forum (for example, a template on AfD or an article on MfD), the misplaced discussion may be procedurally closed and the page renominated on the correct forum, with the original nomination, and any comments made so far, copied over to the new nomination. The closing comment should indicate where the discussion has been moved. This does not strictly count as a speedy keep, since the page still remains nominated for deletion.

Please realize that while you may personally dislike having a deletion tag on your favorite article/template/image/etc, the harm it does is minimal, and either the article or the tag will be gone in around a week. Also be aware that the speedy keep criteria, particularly the first three, are not to be used to express strong disapproval of the nomination: a rationale that you don't agree with is still an argument for deletion, is not necessarily vexatious, and does not imply the nominator has neglected to read the page.

What is not a speedy-keep

[edit | edit source]

Script error: No such module "Wn/syl/Anchor".

Template:Wn/syl/Nutshell should not be used in articles. Please remove it from this page.

The "snowball clause" is a valid criterion for an early close, and is not subject to any of the other criteria necessary for a speedy keep, but it is not a speedy keep criterion itself. Specifically, discussions must meet specific criteria to be speedily kept. "Snowball closes" are justified by "Ignore all rules" and "Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy" as opposed to a specific set of guidelines. For that reason, "snow closes" may be controversial and additional care is warranted. Though the two may seem similar, closes under the snowball clause should never be closed as "speedy keep."

Notes

[edit | edit source]
  1. An example of this includes posting a nomination in response to a proposed deletion but advocating a keep position. (If you want to record a rationale for the PROD-tag removal, see Template:Wn/syl/Section link.)
  2. Unless all such comments support keeping the article, in which case the discussion may be closed as a speedy keep.