Template_talk:Wp/nod/ᨩᩨ᩵1A55

Documentation during Transliteration by {{xlit2}}

(ᨡᩬᩫ​ᨴᩰᩫ᩠ᩈ​ᨴᩦ᩵​ᩋᩪ᩶​ᨶᩲ​ᨽᩣᩈᩣ​ᩋᩢ᩠ᨦᨠᩂᩇ ᨩᩮᩬᩥ᩵ᩋ​​ᩅ᩵ᩤ​ᨤᩫ᩠ᨶ​ᨲ᩵ᩣ᩠ᨦ​ᨷᨴᩮ᩠ᩈ​ᩋᩣ᩠ᨧ​ᨧᩢ​ᨲᩬ᩶ᨦ​ᩋ᩵ᩣ᩠ᨶ)

By convention, I have omitted the prefix Wp/nod/ in this discussion.

When rendered in transliteration by {{xlit2}}, there are two problems with the documentation.

Firstly, the parameter ᩅᨳ is not passed to the template. As a consequence, the template expansion is shown as the transliteration of the result of {{ᨩᩨ᩵1A55}} i.e. of ᩁ ᩌᩰᩫᨦ (ᩁ ᩌᩰᩫᨦ at time of writing, yielding ร โฮง) rather than as the transliterated result of {{ᨩᩨ᩵1A55|ᩅᨳ=ᨠ}} i.e. ระโฮง at time of writing.

Secondly, the documentation page is not being transcluded in the transliteration. I suspect that this is a problem with the interpretation of <noinclude> and <includeonly>, with fun and games to come from <onlyinclude>.

For now, the expedient to deal with the second problem is to move the invocation of {{xlit2}} to immediately after the unconditionally included portion so as to improve the appearance. It should not be emulated if the problem is fixed before November of this year, because the fix would then have to be removed.

-- RichardW57 (talk) 12:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

First problem has now been fixed, in Module:Translit2. --RichardW57m (talk) 14:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Documentation during Transliteration by {{xlit2}}

(ขอ​โทส​ที่​อู้​ใน​ภาสา​อังกฤษ เชื่อ​​ว่า​ฅน​ต่าง​บเทส​อาจ​จัก​ต้อง​อ่าน)

By convention, I have omitted the prefix Wp/nod/ in this discussion.

When rendered in transliteration by {{xlit2}}, there are two problems with the documentation.

Firstly, the parameter ᩅᨳ is not passed to the template. As a consequence, the template expansion is shown as the transliteration of the result of {{ᨩᩨ᩵1A55}} i.e. of ᩁ ᩌᩰᩫᨦ (ᩁ ᩌᩰᩫᨦ at time of writing, yielding ร โฮง) rather than as the transliterated result of {{ᨩᩨ᩵1A55|ᩅᨳ=ᨠ}} i.e. ระโฮง at time of writing.

Secondly, the documentation page is not being transcluded in the transliteration. I suspect that this is a problem with the interpretation of <noinclude> and <includeonly>, with fun and games to come from <onlyinclude>.

For now, the expedient to deal with the second problem is to move the invocation of {{xlit2}} to immediately after the unconditionally included portion so as to improve the appearance. It should not be emulated if the problem is fixed before November of this year, because the fix would then have to be removed.

-- RichardW57 (talk) 12:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

First problem has now been fixed, in Module:Translit2. --RichardW57m (talk) 14:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)