Incubator talk:Wikis

Grouping[edit source]

It would be great if this list is grouped according language group/family. -- Si Gam (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Number of articles[edit source]

Please add to table Number of articles each wikis. As here --Kaiyr (talk) 18:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Tuvalkin (talk) 23:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a listing for «Orqnchi'a Aqoana / 𐤏𐤓𐤊𐤍𐤆𐤉𐤀 𐤀𐤒𐤏𐤀𐤍𐤀», with the language name splled in both Latin and Phoenician scripts. While I’d find extremely neat to learn that this South American language has been orthographed to use something other than the Latin script, I think this is rather a case of trolling, as the en:wp article mentions nothing of the sort. Tuvalkin (talk) 23:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"having some active content creation since the beginning of 2016"[edit source]

I think it's OK for me to change it to 2017 now? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: Well, don't do that yet, because I haven't actually started a new review of the tests, and what is here still reflects "2016", not "2017". I'm planning to do a review (with 2017 as the basis) during December, and when I'm done I'll change it. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When start 2019 verification?[edit source]

--117.13.95.179 08:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What are you asking? StevenJ81 (talk) 14:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Steven, I think they're meaning that when we can change "having some active content creation since" year, so I guess that changing that in every April, May or June of year would better? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226, Ooswesthoesbes: You changed it earlier last year than I would have.

In any case, the main thing that drives this for me is the not-quite-twice-yearly review I do of all the tests—last round with the help of OWTB—and which I use to populate {{Test status statistics}}. The "active content creation since" should change no more often than every other review cycle. The reason is that for the in-between cycles, that means that all already-active tests are still active, which cuts down the workload a bit.

On the current "every seven months or so" cycle, the next review would be in about April, and the following review in November. So that probably makes something like October 1 the time to push it forward this year. StevenJ81 (talk)

Chickasaw[edit source]

The Chickasaw language is Chikashsha in Chickasaw.Ndołkah (talk) 10:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most active incubator wikis[edit source]

Is there a way to see which incubator wikis are the most active ones? A list like meta:List of Wikipedias would be helpful. Voltairacus (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Voltairacus status=active? Or you can consider Incubator:Featured wikis if very big. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TumiMajess[edit source]

Hi Money

TumiMqjess[edit source]

Hi help me solve all error problems

Please add Old Japanese Wikipedia[edit source]

There has been Old Japanese Wikipedia for about 1.5 years, but it hasn't been added to the list of Wikimedia Incubator. https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/ojp/%E3%83%A1%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8

Hi, as Incubator:Administrators'_noticeboard#ojp_code_doesn't_work said, we don't allow any ancient, extinct and/or historical languages to be incubated, so not done, sadly. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia East Frisian (wp/frs) Ōstfräisk[edit source]

I think the link is misleading. It points at an incubator Wiki for Eastern Frisian Low German (code frs) but it directs to an article about Saterland Frisian language (code stq). For Saterland Frisian a Wikipedia exists. 2.65.105.209 16:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]